Blog
FiveM Ban Systems Done Right: Identifiers, Ban Evasion and a Fair Appeals Workflow
FiveM Ban Systems Done Right: Identifiers, Ban Evasion and a Fair Appeals Workflow
A ban system is only as strong as the identifiers backing it. Most server owners who get frustrated by returning griefers are making the same mistake: banning a single identifier, usually the license, and wondering why the same player is back within an hour. This guide covers how FiveM identifiers actually work, how to store them properly, what ban evasion looks like in practice, and how to run an appeals workflow that protects both the player and your moderation team.
Why Banning One Identifier Is Not Enough
When a player connects, FiveM sends a set of identifiers to the server. If your ban resource checks only the license and that license appears on a ban list, the player is rejected. That sounds reasonable until you consider what license actually is: a Rockstar Social Club identifier tied to a game copy. Rockstar accounts are cheap, game copies go on sale, and a determined griefer can have an alt ready in fifteen minutes. Relying on one anchor gives the evader one thing to swap.
A robust ban stores every identifier present at the moment of the ban and checks all of them on every future connection. The evader now has to clear all of them simultaneously, which is substantially harder.
The FiveM Identifier Set and How Durable Each One Is
FiveM exposes identifiers through the native GetPlayerIdentifiers call. Here is what each one means and how much you can rely on it:
- license / license2 — Rockstar Social Club identifiers.
licenseis the SHA-1 hash of the account;license2is a newer variant. Both are tied to an account, not a hardware device. Swappable by buying or creating another Rockstar account. - steam — Steam account identifier, present only when the player launched with Steam. Absent if they use the standalone Rockstar launcher. Swappable with a new or alt Steam account, but adds another axis to beat.
- discord — Discord user snowflake ID, present only when the player has Discord linked in the FiveM client settings. Easy to swap with a new Discord account or simply by unlinking it, so treat this as corroborating evidence rather than a hard ban anchor.
- ip — The connecting IP address. The weakest identifier of all. Changes with a VPN flip, a router reboot on a dynamic connection, or a phone hotspot. Store it for logging and pattern analysis, but never use it as your primary ban key.
- xbl / live — Xbox Live and Microsoft account identifiers, present on Windows when the player is signed into the Microsoft Store or Xbox app. More durable than Discord but still accountbased and therefore replaceable.
- fivem — The FiveM account identifier, tied to the player’s cfx.re/FiveM account. Slightly harder to rotate than a Discord account but still account-level, not hardware-level.
- token0, token1, token2 … (hardware tokens) — These are the closest thing FiveM has to hardware identifiers. They are derived from a combination of device characteristics and are significantly harder to spoof than any of the account-based identifiers above. A player evading a ban who has not spoofed these will trip on them even after swapping every account. Store all token identifiers present at ban time.
Storing Multiple Identifiers Per Ban Record
A solid ban record captures the full identifier payload at the moment the ban is applied — license, license2, steam if present, discord if present, fivem, all tokens, and IP for context. When a player connects, your ban resource iterates every stored identifier across every active ban and rejects the connection on any match.
This approach also enables passive alt-detection. If a connecting player shares a token with a banned record but has a different license, you have strong evidence of an alt account. Flag it, log it, and handle it with elevated scrutiny rather than an automatic silent pass.
Many resources available on cfxmods-tebex.io implement multi-identifier ban storage out of the box, which saves significant development time compared to rolling your own from scratch.
Recommended FiveM scripts for your server
How Ban Evasion Works in Practice
Understanding the evasion playbook helps you close the gaps:
- New Rockstar / FiveM account — Takes minutes. Defeated by token matching.
- New Discord account — Trivial. Treat Discord absence as a yellow flag on new accounts.
- VPN — Rotates the IP identifier. Defeated by not relying on IP as a primary ban key.
- Alt Steam account — Adds cost but not safety if tokens are stored.
- HWID spoofer — Software tools that attempt to randomize or fake the values that feed hardware token generation. This is the most serious evasion vector. Effectiveness varies by tool quality and FiveM version. Combining token bans with new-account scrutiny (automatic hold for manual review on accounts under a threshold age or playtime) catches many spoofer users who are otherwise clean on identifiers.
The countermeasure stack: store all tokens at ban time, link alts by shared-identifier detection, require a minimum account age or playtime before full server access, and log any connection where an identifier partially matches a ban record for manual review.
Logging Evidence at the Time of the Ban
A ban that cannot be defended is a liability. Every ban record should include at minimum: the full identifier payload, the banning admin’s identifier, a written reason specific enough to be re-read six months later, a timestamp, and links or references to any supporting evidence (chat logs, clip URLs, admin notes). Vague reasons like “cheating” are not enough — “aimbot detected, clip linked, observed over 15 minutes by two admins” is defensible.
Store this in a database, not a flat file. You need to be able to query by identifier, by admin, by date range, and by reason keyword when investigating appeals or auditing admin conduct.
Ban Durations and an Escalation Template
Not every offense warrants a permanent ban. A tiered approach is more defensible and reduces the pressure players feel to evade rather than wait out a reasonable suspension:
- First offense, minor (chat toxicity, minor rule break): 1–7 day suspension, warning on record.
- Repeat minor or first major offense (exploiting, harassment): 7–30 days.
- Severe or repeated major offense (cheating, griefing after prior bans): permanent, all identifiers stored.
- Confirmed cheating with hard evidence: permanent, no automatic eligibility for appeal within 90 days.
Document this scale publicly in your server rules. When players know the tiers exist, appeals that claim “I didn’t know” carry less weight, and fair escalation becomes defensible to your own community.
A Fair Appeals Workflow
Permanent bans without an appeals path are a one-way door that often produce evasion as the only perceived option. A structured appeals process protects players from wrongful permabans and protects you from reputational damage when a ban turns out to have been incorrect.
The minimum viable appeals workflow:
- A public submission form (Discord thread, forum post, or dedicated tool) that captures the player’s name, claimed ban reason, their side of the events, and any evidence they want to submit.
- Review by an admin who was not involved in the original ban. Conflict of interest in appeals is a common failure point on smaller servers.
- Access to the original ban record, including the evidence logged at ban time, so the reviewer can assess the case independently.
- A written decision with a reason, regardless of outcome. “Appeal denied, original evidence stands” is acceptable. No response is not.
- A genuine possibility of reduction — for example, converting a permanent ban to a 90-day suspension on a first confirmed cheat if circumstances were mitigating. This matters more for community trust than for the individual case.
Set and publish a response window (five to seven business days is standard) and hold to it. Unanswered appeals breed evasion attempts and community distrust far faster than denied appeals do.
Upgrade your server — shop our FiveM scripts
Putting It Together
A ban system that actually works stores every available identifier at ban time, treats hardware tokens as the hardest eviction anchor, actively detects alts through shared-identifier matching, escalates proportionally rather than reaching for the permanent ban by default, and handles appeals through a documented, unbiased process. The technical side is well-supported — resources built for multi-identifier bans are available through reputable stores like marketplace-tebex.io and fivem-tebex.store — but the policy layer is what determines whether your moderation holds up under scrutiny. Get both right.